October 8, 2019
BE ADVISED: THE FOLLOWING CONTAINS ADULT LANGUAGE AND CONTENT.
A written word is the choicest of relics. It is something at once more intimate with us and more universal than any other work of art. It is nearest to life itself – Thoreau
It is one of my favorite quotes from Walden. So, who’s the dumb idiot that let them steal my Walden book from my home because I published this quote, at least a year or more ago, here? Was it jealousy because his name is Henry David Thoreau? Penis envy?
This has been on my mind for several days, and this goes back for quite some time, there is something in this, the light rail was on the election ballot here in Hillsborough county, Florida. A proposition was proposed of a light rail from Tampa, to Orlando, to Miami. I voted yes on it every time. This same stupid debate of it being a waste of tax-payers money was in the news, a lot.
The light rail was on the ballot several times, it eventually got voted in, meaning it had enough yes votes from the taxpayers, that the proposition should have gone forward. Then, it got placed on the ballot again, quite literally asking the voters, did you really mean to vote for the light rail? It got turned down, shut down, voted against. This has never made sense to me.
How is it that a proposition can be presented to it voters, the voters, vote yes, and then it so much as gets questioned with another ballot vote. It is very unusual. Because I’ve spoken to a lot of people about the need for everyday citizens, like myself to have access to public transportation.
Florida is very spread out, a city such as Tampa can be considered much further than the city limits, it is how the people think here. Most everything within the Tampa Bay area here are at least a 30 to 40 to an hour’s drive in one direction.
Perhaps people already know about this, it is something the public should be aware about. There is something there. Especially considering I am most recently from a suburb of Portland, Oregon, and there was a light rail built and in place before we moved that went from my town of Gresham, to Downtown Portland.
It is going to take a long time to decode all of Angels and Demons. It is very audible, and it intricate.
Do you believe in God, sir? Says, six and seven o’clocks. It is also, an either, or.
The understanding God scene says, do you, the real Hannibal Lecter believe in Cherith Gjestland?
The story about finding the anti-matter, really, doesn’t matter. Don’t follow it, it will get you nowhere. It just helps the storytelling, and the experience of the movie, probably the book, too. I’d have to read it.
What make you think he’s going to murder the cardinals says, Cherith would be able to figure out the precursor to the real Hannibal Lecter’s murders, meaning how they brain-researched, the real Hannibal Lecter.
I like this word, and that may or may not mean anything, I really do like being able to speak in different languages. L’Altare della scienza. It could be code for either, lass, or last. So, it could reference a last murder.
The cruelest honor in Christendom, is quite odd. It doesn’t belong there. The sentence doesn’t belong there. It literally says, it doesn’t belong there. So, it is possible it has several meanings, people, places, things, objects, events, happenings, and so on.
Must not give oxygen, this is meant for the real Hannibal Lecter to figure out, if he hasn’t already.
The word, issues says, National Geographic. I did buy a few National Geographic’s at a Goodwill store in Tampa, on Kennedy Blvd, when I was in college. I was looking for costumes, for school.
Issues also, says, visual aid, visual aid also says, VA, veteran’s Administration.
Is this dialogue original to the book? Is it in the book, verbatim? If God has any issues, it’s not with what I’ve done, they will be with what I’m about to do. Is it original to the book?
By the way, the actor playing the role of the assassin, looks to me like he was cast for his shoe size. Cherith really does know where to look on a man, and it is not his crotch. Shoes and feet tell more.
I ask if it is original because I wrote it on paper from memory, as I’s, and not plural, we’s and them. It makes me question if either in the mind of the author or another man, it is a singular, I. Meaning, Cherith is most important, and the they’s and we’s are support staff.
Father, if God, has issues, there is no Father, in this dialogue, if God says, GI, has issues, my father’s initials, no father, it is just a timeline, I was by myself in California, without my family. Don’t get confused, it is only detail.
They won’t be with I’ve done, with that I’ve done is the only thing of importance in that line and that says, Christ on the cross, dying for our sins, dying for God’s children because he so beloved the world, He gave His only begotten Son.
They will be with what I’m about, to do. There is no to-do. Not in this sentence, or code. They will be with what I’m about goes like this:
They will be
With what
I’m about
Three, two, two. Add it together, seven- Cherith.
They will be with – goes together, these are plural, eyeballs, I’s.
What I’m about, what says, why, I’m says, eye, meaning eyeballs, about says, fight. It is also, on the assassin’s face, his eyeglasses. Is this in the original book? Does he wear eyeglasses?
What, is a bridge or nose on a face, glasses sit or rest on the bridge of the nose. Detail.
The most exciting or interesting symbol in that sentence is about. Take a-b-o-u-t, all lower case, and write a-b-o-u-t on top of each other, it turns into a symbol of the burning bush and the cross that Christ was crucified upon. Burning bush says, Mount, meaning, mountain.
It’s referenced in 12 Strong, when a piece of The World Trade Center, a reason why, is given.
And, that’s as far as I’ve gotten, again. It’s very intricate.
WE - DO NOT AGREE! 