BE ADVISED: THE FOLLOWING AND FRONTAL CONTAINS ADULT LANGUAGE AND CONTENT.
MAKE SURE THIS GETS TO A MAN WHO ISN’T AFRAID, AND IS WILLING TO TAKE ORDERS FROM A WOMAN, AND THAT WOMAN IS CHERITH GJESTLAND AND NO OTHER!
January 29, 2020
It’s a very weak argument if you have someone saying they didn’t know they shouldn’t have given information, personal information into my whereabouts while in the employment of CCTV and protection watching into this very house that allowed the car accident in 2013 to happen.
A car accident that they used blinds on the road, and switched drivers, and bought – cops, to ticket, me instead.
It’s like saying, as a police officer I didn’t know it was not okay to give personal information of the victim, to the criminal, behind bars, and then open the goddamn cell for them and let them walk out. Oh, I’m not supposed to give them her phone number, address, access code to the gate at her complex?
It’s a very weak argument. An employer, such as David, did David hire these people? Or, whoever, whomever hired them has to believe that there are grown-ups able to make mature decisions. And, that whoever is hired will be working from a place of understanding the importance of their work.
Be very careful, if anything had happened to me, had I died, they would have hunted her and her family and all involved down, and killed them. They still will if anything happens to me.
Should they have worked from a place more secure like a military compound, probably. However, the employer didn’t know they were hired to protect – Weapons. Also, the employer is working on the premise that the employees they hire are not sabotaging the work for which they were hired.
It’s a weak argument.
WE - DO NOT AGREE! 